<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neither rhyme nor reason &#187; lca2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marty.sunriseroad.net/category/lca2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marty.sunriseroad.net</link>
	<description>An infrequent blog from Martin Visser</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linux.conf.au 2008 &#8211; Day 1</title>
		<link>http://marty.sunriseroad.net/2008/01/28/linuxconfau-2008-day-1/</link>
		<comments>http://marty.sunriseroad.net/2008/01/28/linuxconfau-2008-day-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Visser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lca2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux.conf.au]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marty.sunriseroad.net/2008/01/28/linuxconfau-2008-day-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it&#8217;s the conclusion of Day 1 of linux.conf.au. (The official conf doesn&#8217;t start till Wednesday &#8211; but the mini-confs are just as much value). I hovered between the security mini-conf and a few others. Michael Davies gave a quite informative talk on signing code fragments before they end up in distro repos. Enno Davids [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s the conclusion of Day 1 of <a href="http://linux.conf.au/">linux.conf.au</a>. (The official conf doesn&#8217;t start till Wednesday &#8211; but the mini-confs are just as much value). I hovered between the security mini-conf and a few others.  <a href="http://michaeldavies.org/software/zign-tools/">Michael Davies</a> gave a quite informative talk on signing code fragments before they end up in distro repos. Enno Davids talk on self-defending networks was pretty neat. He had some good insight into the issues surroung DDoS attacks &#8211; particular he propogates some useful ideas that might make use of ICMP to signal pwned bot hosts operating systems to back off for a little while. (Of course this assumes that the essential integrity of the bot herd&#8217;s host operating system is not compromised <img src='http://marty.sunriseroad.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  . There was a very neat lighting talk from a real white-hat hacker (who seems fairly grey in a lot of his outlook) called <a href="http://www.storm.net.nz/metl">Metlstorm</a>. He is a Kiwi his alterego is Adam Boileau. Pretty smart guy working on a lot of projects. ssh-jack allows you to eavesdrop on a ssh session on your host, without letting the user being aware &#8211; purportedly to keep an eye on the bad guys.</p>
<p>We also had a pretty long-winded GPG key signing party. Unfortunately I feel pretty deflated after finding about I got duped by one of the attendees with dubious ID &#8211; http://madduck.net/blog/2008.01.28:on-the-point-of-keysigning/ . What I am more dissapointed in is that the keysigning herd didn&#8217;t protect itself, instead letting everyman fend for themselves. Clearly in my mind a true Web of Trust ought to protect itself when an attack on it&#8217;s integrity is observed. I can only blame myself for accepting Martin&#8217;s ID (and in hindsight I can remeber even what it looked like), but I do feel there should be an obligation to protect each other. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marty.sunriseroad.net/2008/01/28/linuxconfau-2008-day-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

